CSO Master Plan
- CSO Control Solutions
- Costs and Funding
The City of Winnipeg (City) is proceeding with a major infrastructure upgrade program, called the Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Master Plan, to manage the effects of combined sewer overflows (CSOs) on our waterways.
The CSO Master Plan includes proposed CSO control solutions, cost estimates, funding scenarios and provides a roadmap for achieving our goal of reducing CSOs in Winnipeg.
The operation of the combined sewer system in Winnipeg is governed by Environment Act Licence No. 3042 (EA No. 3042), issued by the Province of Manitoba (through Manitoba Sustainable Development or MSD) in September of 2013.
Goals for Reducing CSOs
The CSO Master Plan outlines long-term goals for reducing the amount of CSOs entering our waterways and will be carried out in two phases.
Control Target 1
The CSO Master Plan will work to reduce the effects of CSOs on our waterways by increasing the amount of CSOs that are treated at our sewage treatment plants before being released into the river. The plan is designed to take the current sewer system from collecting about 74 percent of overflow volume and treating it, to collecting and treating 85 percent of overflow volume by 2045.
Control Target 2
The CSO Master Plan will work towards a higher level of CSO capture which is yet to be determined. An updated CSO Master Plan to determine the next level of control is required to be submitted to Manitoba Sustainable Development by April 30, 2030.
Note: All goals for CSO reduction are based on the Representative Year.
CSO Control Solutions
There are two types of control solutions that will be used in the CSO Master Plan to help reduce the effects of CSOs on our waterways; grey infrastructure and green infrastructure.
Grey infrastructure refers to the conventional, large scale infrastructure projects such as:
- Sewer separation
Physical separation involves installing an entirely new land drainage or wastewater sewer, separate from the combined sewer. The combined sewer is then converted to become exclusively a wastewater sewer or land drainage sewer, creating a separate sewer system.
- In-line storage
In-line storage retains land drainage runoff (rain and snowmelt) in the combined sewer pipes during smaller wet weather events. Weir control gates are installed at CSO outfall points to prevent flows from reaching the river for a specific design event, storing flows in the sewer. Following the wet weather event, the stored flow, which contains both wastewater and land drainage runoff, is pumped to the sewage treatment plant as usual. Storage capacity is limited by the size of the existing sewer pipe.
- Latent storage
The storage volume already available in relief sewers with separate outfalls is referred to as latent storage. This type of storage requires a new pump station to pump captured flows back to the combined sewer system as relief sewers are lower in level than combined sewers. Storage capacity is limited by the size of the existing sewer pipe and the river level, as high water levels in the river can hold relief sewers' outfall flap gates closed.
- Off-line storage
Off-line storage utilizes tanks or other storage infrastructure to store flows during periods of heavy rainfall or snowmelt. Following the wet weather event, the stored flow, which contains both wastewater and land drainage runoff, is pumped to the sewage treatment plant.
- Floatables management
The use of bar screening at discharge points (outfalls) to reduce the volume of debris reaching our waterways.
Green infrastructure (GI) refers to projects that use natural hydrologic processes to keep rainwater out of the sewer systems. The CSO Master Plan focuses on traditional and well established grey infrastructure, but also includes provisions for green infrastructure. Research on green infrastructure technologies will be required to determine their application in Winnipeg prior to implementation within the City. Where feasible, the following technologies may be utilized within the CSO Master Plan:
- Runoff water collection
Rain barrels capture and store roof runoff for future use, reducing flows that enter the combined sewer system. The collected water can be used for watering lawns and gardens.
- Bioretention systems and bioswales
Bioretention areas, or rain gardens, are shallow surface depressions planted with specially selected native vegetation to capture and treat land drainage runoff. Wet weather flow will pool in the depression area and then infiltrate into the soil or evaporate.
Bioswales are swales that contain grass and other vegetation, which has an enhanced top soil layer and infiltration underlayer. They decrease the rate at which runoff flows, increasing surface contact time and the ability to soak into the soil.
While all species of vegetation have multiple benefits for runoff management, native or indigenous species of plants provide even greater benefits. They typically require less irrigation than non-native species and have a higher survival rate. In Winnipeg, native species have deeper roots systems which filter excessive nutrients from runoff.
- Green roofs
Growing vegetation on flat or sloped roofs helps to soak up and store rain water and snowmelt. Simple vegetation with minimal access can be used, although the roof has to be designed for this extra load. There are also more intensive green roofs that are accessible to the public, creating park-like vegetation. Some examples are found at Manitoba Hydro Place and Millennium Library Park.
- Permeable paving
Runoff is reduced by using pavement types that allow water to permeate and infiltrate into the ground below. Types of permeable paving include unit paving blocks and cobble stones.
- Green streets
Green streets incorporate several different green infrastructure elements so that they can work together to reduce land drainage runoff. Other ways to increase the benefits of green streets are:
- Maximizing tree canopies helps reduce runoff by catching rainfall, absorbing moisture and improving runoff quality.
- Using soil amendments, such as compost, when soils are disturbed during development. When healthy soils are removed or compacted, their effectiveness in retaining and filtering runoff is reduced.
- Ensuring existing habitats are protected and that the natural drainage systems are kept in place.
Costs and Funding
Conceptual level Class 5 capital cost estimates, which have an accuracy from -50 percent to +100 percent, were developed for the proposed control solutions selected for each sewer district. The figure below shows a breakdown of the proposed work to achieve the 85 percent capture in a representative year before the estimating accuracy ranges are applied.
When the top end of the accuracy range is applied (+100 percent), the CSO MP Capital cost is estimated at $2.3 billion in 2019 dollars.
Changes in Capital Cost Estimates
There have been changes in the capital cost estimates since the CSO Master Plan Preliminary Proposal was submitted on December 17, 2015. Reasons for the differences in capital costs are as follows:
Inflation of the Preliminary Proposal
The capital cost estimates in the Preliminary Proposal were in 2014 dollar values. Inflation at three percent between the years of 2014-2019 equate to a net 16 percent increase (greater than $200 million) between the Preliminary Proposal and Master Plan.
Change in the classification range of accuracy for cost estimating
For the Preliminary Proposal, a plus 50 percent of capital cost was used to represent the budget estimating amount. In 2015, the City moved to the AACE classification system and the top end of the accuracy range was increased to plus 100 percent of capital cost (a $700 million increase).
Preliminary Proposal to Master Plan Program Changes
- Added a ten percent Green Infrastructure allowance (greater than $100 million) for climate change resiliency
- Increased level of solution detail
- An increase in the amount of sewer separation projects selected for control options, which have a higher capital cost, but lower operating costs
2019- Capital Costs
|Base Construction with Markup||$829,500,000||$962,000,000||$1,150,400,000 **|
|Base Cost + 50 percent Estimating Allowance||$1,245,000,000 *||$1,444,200,000||$1,725,600,000|
|Base Cost + 100 percent Estimating Allowance||$1,659,000,000||$1,924,000,000||$2,300,800,000 **|
* Cost as shown in 2015 Preliminary Proposal with a +50 percent estimating allowance
** Cost as shown in the Master Plan includes a 10% allowance for green infrastructure projects
The current average annual CSO budget in order to fund the proposed work is $26.5 Million. This is proposed to be increased to $30 million per year.
In order to complete the CSO Master Plan near the recommended year of 2045, the City is seeking a Tri-level funding agreement between the Government of Canada, Government of Manitoba and the City of Winnipeg (i.e. Scenario 1). The shared funding required is capped at $30 million per year each, with a total estimated capital expenditure of $90 million per year (2019 dollars). If the funding is limited to only the City's proposed funding or equivalent to $30 million per year (i.e. Scenario 3), the program is estimated to take until 2095 to complete.
|Program Scenario||Description||Funding by||Annual Budget||Completion Timeline|
|Scenario 1||3 Levels of Funding
3 x $30 Million
|City + Two Additional||$90 Million||2047
|Scenario 2||2 Levels of Funding
2 x $30 Million
|City + One Additional||$60 Million|| 2059
|Scenario 3||1 Level of Funding
1 x $30 Million
(75 years )
Annual cost escalation at three percent for construction is a significant risk to the CSO Master Plan. If committed funding is less than the forecasted it could result in four times the capital costs and take three times longer to implement. To put cost escalation into context, the work to complete aspects of the Aqueduct in 1919 cost approximately $17 million in 1919 dollars. That same work escalated to 2018 dollars would cost over $1.15 Billion dollars (99 years later).
Following submission of the CSO Master Plan in August 2019, Manitoba Conservation and Climate approved the CSO Master Plan in November 2019. The City will continue with the committed sewer separation projects and annual CSO results reporting as required by EA No. 3042 and meet the new requirements in the implementation phase.
The Water and Waste Department will transition from program planning to program management for the implementation phase.
There are multiple projects within the CSO Master Plan, many of which the City has already started implementing:
Sewer Separation Projects
The City has been actively completing sewer separation in the following sewer districts since 2013:
Ongoing Water Quality Monitoring
Comprehensive water quality river and stream monitoring and overflow pollution discharge characterization was undertaken in 2014 and 2015 as part of the CSO Master Plan. It is proposed that the City continues with their bi-weekly river and stream water quality monitoring as part of the CSO Master Plan.
The program implementation has included a start-up period of four years following submission of the CSO Master Plan. This time is to allow for a multi-year tri-government funding agreement to be put in place.
If funding is not received from the other levels of government, the City will continue implementing the CSO Master Plan, but with a longer time frame based on the total available CSO budget.
Annual Progress Reporting
Approval of the CSO Master Plan triggered Clause 13 of EA No. 3042 requiring annual progress reporting to begin. This includes a summary of planned and completed projects and an estimate of the system performance for the 1992 Representative Year.
The first of these reports can be found here.
2030 CSO Master Plan Update
The CSO Master Plan update, scheduled for 2030, may substantially increase the program requirements. Close collaboration with Manitoba Conservation and Climate on regulatory issues will be required throughout the evaluation period to determine the next target level of CSO control.
The main benefits of CSO Master Plan are:
- Fewer sewer overflows during wet weather events
- Lower risk for basement flooding in Winnipeg homes
- Green Infrastructure will beautify our city with more trees and lush landscaping
- Our sewer system will be able to operate more efficiently
Sewer separation projects have been selected for combined sewer districts where basement flooding relief projects are required, thereby providing shared costs and joint benefits. Sewer separation projects also:
- Lower long-term maintenance and treatment costs for our sewage treatment plants, as less rainfall will be directed to the plants during wet weather events
- Reduce the occurrences of sewer backup and basement flooding
- Improves water quality, as there will be fewer instances of bacteria spikes and floatables entering the river
- Creates additional storage capacity for increased real-time control benefit
- Reduces flood pumping and the requirement to screen
In-line and Latent Storage
In-line and latent storage is inexpensive and offsets the need for much more expensive CSO control options by using infrastructure that is already in place to provide additional temporary storage for rainfall during wet weather events.
Off-line storage does not disrupt the current sewer system during construction, meaning diversion of existing flows is not required.
Green Infrastructure (climate change resilience)
Green infrastructure (GI) projects not only beautify our city, but also:
- Reduce the volume of rainfall that might otherwise enter into the combined sewer system
- Improve the water quality of nearby waterways, as they can reduce the amount of pollutant runoff
- May provide cooling effects and help improve air quality
GI solutions are proposed to provide resilience to the potential impacts of climate change on the CSO Master Plan. An additional 10% has been added to the CSO Master Plan budget for GI solutions to capture additional runoff and improve water quality while also providing multiple additional benefits.
The benefits of installing flow monitors and flow control structures in the sewer system include:
- Optimizing the capacity during wet weather events
- Reducing the volume of CSO discharge to the rivers
- Protecting against basement flooding
Alternative Floatables Management
Alternative floatables management projects are beneficial to our waterways as they:
- Reduce the volume of floatables reaching our waterways by using methods such as source control, catch basin cleaning and street sweeping
- May result in reduced sewer cleaning requirements
- Improve road drainage efficiency
- 2019 CSO Annual Report
- 2019 CSO Master Plan Approval Letter
- 2019 CSO Master Plan
- Alexander District Plan
- Armstrong District Plan
- Ash District Plan
- Assiniboine District Plan
- Aubrey District Plan
- Baltimore District Plan
- Bannatyne District Plan
- Clifton District Plan
- Cockburn and Calrossie Districts Plan
- Colony District Plan
- Cornish District Plan
- Despins District Plan
- Doncaster District Plan
- Douglas Park District Plan
- Dumoulin District Plan
- Ferry Road District Plan
- Hart District Plan
- Hawthorne District Plan
- Jefferson East District Plan
- Jefferson West District Plan
- Jessie District Plan
- La Verendrye District Plan
- Linden District Plan
- Mager District Plan
- Marion District Plan
- Metcalfe District Plan
- Mission District Plan
- Moorgate District Plan
- Munroe District Plan
- Munroe Annex District Plan
- Newton District Plan
- Parkside District Plan
- Polson District Plan
- River District Plan
- Riverbend District Plan
- Roland District Plan
- Selkirk District Plan
- St. Johns District Plan
- Strathmillan District Plan
- Syndicate District Plan
- Tuxedo District Plan
- Tylehurst District Plan
- Woodhaven District Plan
The District Engineering Plans are part of 2019 CSO Master Plan, not standalone documents.
- 2017 CSO Master Plan Preliminary Proposal Approval Letter
- 2015 CSO Master Plan Preliminary Proposal
- 2013 CSO Environment Act Licence No. 3042